5
a
well
M
On the second charge I may as
say
that I have officially called.
the Colonial Surgeon for a distinct
statement
to the alleged intimidation
of him, and that officer has decided
the point beyond all further doubt (if
double there
were ) in the encloud
conccxonbenec.
10.
&
reeurs to
me
also that Mr.
Munow's 3rd charge against the Stercules brought forward for the
Robinson is now first time. It is as baseless
as the
others. I find a short correspondence
on record which shows
W
follows:
On the 14th June 1861 Sir Hercules
Robinson told M. Minnow be should
No 3.
7
150
seceive a
printed copy of
Mr Caldwell's
refence, and
any
answer the chose to
ว
make would be printed on
the
Minutes - The
Copy
when printed
M
accordingly furnished to m.
Murrow on the 26th August _ A whol mouth clapeed during which nothing
came from
from Mr. Murrow, and on the 24th September the Inquiry terminated. The Printing of the Minutes of the Inquiry was concluded in the end of December, and on the 27th and 28th of that moult Md. Murrow addressed the clerk of Councils complaining
that his answer
to Mr Caldwell would not appear attached to them - Mr Almada's
1. concluding letter is inclosed and will
مهر
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.